托福写作话题解析——环境类

为了帮助大家备考托福写作，提高托福分数，下面小编给大家带来托福写作话题解析——环境类，望喜欢！

托福写作话题解析——环境类

虽说环境问题是托福独立写作中的熟脸，我们生活中也经常会谈论到它。但就是这样一个貌似无处不在的热点词，在实际写作中论述起来却比屌丝娶个白富美还难。有的同学一看到关于环境问题的题目就顿时觉得大脑转速不够喉头发紧肠胃打结，真是不会再爱了啊，除了不乱扔不吐痰多种树木少用煤就没话说了啊?看这句Beijing is regularly hit by extended bouts of choking, acrid smog, with heavy industries and car-use both among the key culprits.　既然说到环境问题，那么就让我们来看看目前人们面临着什么样子的环境问题吧。面临环境问题怎么说呢?“be faced with”?这如同满大街的人都用iPhone一样，托福评分老师简直要哭了。看看原文，一个“hit”简洁有力，还让人有一种扑面而来精神一震的感觉，北京被“extended bouts of choking, acrid smog”也就是大面积的呛人的雾霾雾霾击中了，那这影响还能不恶劣吗?而导致雾霾的罪魁祸首就是重工业和汽车。等等，罪魁祸首怎么说?--key culprits!

雾霾影响如此之恶劣，政府也迅速采取了措施ing will ban the consumption of high-polluting fuels in downtown areas by 2020, the municipal environmental protection authority said.新闻说北京市区将要在2020年前禁止燃烧high-polluting fuels。这是北京市的一个政策，旨在大幅度降低空气污染。这里的high-polluting fuels是指“高污染燃料”。高污染燃料的范围包括coal, fuel oil, petroleum coke, combustible waste, biomass fuels(煤炭、燃料油、石油焦炭、可燃废弃物、生物质燃料)等。这些燃料是北京雾霾的重要污染源之一，所以是北京市政府着重治理的对象。而且“禁止燃烧”怎么说的来着?人家用的可不是do not burn，看好了，新闻里说的是ban the consumption of。

　　托福写作环境类词汇

ystem 生态系统

ogical balance/equilibrium 生态平衡

iversity 生物多样性

ainable development 可持续发展

erve, preserve 节约使用，保护

ronmentally friendly, environmentalists 对环境无害的，环保主义者

tries must join forces/make concerted efforts/unite to combat/tackle/solve/address environmental problems. 各个国家在应对环境问题上必须协同作战。

e/elevate public awareness of… 增强公众意识

wable resources, non-renewable resources, fossil energy (petroleum, natural gas, coal) 可再生资源，不可再生资源，化石能源(石油，天然气，煤)

ume, deplete, exhaust 消耗，耗光

tage/scarcity/lack of 短缺

a strain on the already stretched resources 是已经短缺的资源更加紧张

restation, illegal logging 砍伐森林

harge/emit green house gases/carbon dioxide 排放温室气体，二氧化碳

exhaust 汽车尾气

-biodegradable/non-decomposable garbage 白色垃圾，不可降解垃圾

　　托福写作环境类素材

一、Hi, everybody. This Monday, I'm heading to Alaska for a three-day tour of the state.

I've been looking forward to this for a long time. Not only because Alaska is one of the most beautiful places in a country that's full of beautiful places-but because I'll have several opportunities to meet with everyday Alaskans about what's going on in their lives. I'll travel throughout the state, meeting with Alaskans who live above the Arctic Circle, with Alaska natives, and with folks who earn their livelihoods through fishing and tourism. And I expect to learn a lot.

One thing I've learned so far is that a lot of these conversations begin with climate change. And that's because Alaskans are already living with its effects. More frequent and extensive wildfires. Bigger storm surges as sea ice melts faster. Some of the swiftest shoreline erosion in the world-in some places, more than three feet a year.

Alaska's glaciers are melting faster too, threatening tourism and adding to rising seas. And if we do nothing, Alaskan temperatures are projected to rise between six and twelve degrees by the end of the century, changing all sorts of industries forever.

二、This is all real. This is happening to our fellow Americans right now. In fact, Alaska's governor recently told me that four villages are in “imminent danger” and have to be relocated. Already, rising sea levels are beginning to swallow one island community.

Think about that. If another country threatened to wipe out an American town, we'd do everything in our power to protect ourselves. Climate change poses the same threat, right now.

That's why one of the things I'll do while I'm in Alaska is to convene other nations to meet this threat. Several Arctic nations have already committed to action. Since the United States and China worked together to set ambitious climate targets last year, leading by example, many of the world's biggest emitters have come forward with new climate plans of their own. And that's a good sign as we approach this December's global climate negotiations in Paris.

三、Now, one of the ways America is leading is by transitioning away from dirty energy sources that threaten our health and our environment, and by going all-in on clean, renewable energy sources like wind and solar. And Alaska has the natural resources to be a global leader in this effort.

Now even as we accelerate this transition, our economy still has to rely on oil and gas. As long as that's the case, I believe we should rely more on domestic production than on foreign imports, and we should demand the highest safety standards in the industry-our own. Still, I know there are Americans who are concerned about oil companies drilling in environmentally sensitive waters. Some are also concerned with my administration's decision to approve Shell's application to drill a well off the Alaskan coast, using leases they purchased before I took office. I share people's concerns about offshore drilling. I remember the BP spill in the Gulf of Mexico all too well.

　　托福写作环境类范文

Topic:

agree or disagree--the environment issues are too complicated, so individuals can do nothing about it on their own

With the Climate Summit in Copenhagen reaching a dead-end and with the fictional movie 2012 turning into a blockbuster, environmental issues have yet again become the most heated topic all over the world. People debate over whether the governments or the individuals should take on the primary role in protecting environment and in fighting pollution. Some hold that individuals should take the initiative but I argue that it is the governments that should take the leading part. The following analysis will further strengthen my viewpoint. In the first place, environmental issues are too complicated and far-reaching for individuals to engage in. the most severe environmental issues today, such as global warming, various pollutions and preservation of wild species, are found in almost every country in the world. Individuals scattered across the globe can do very little to solve these problems without the mobilization and organization of their governments. The solution to environmental problems lies in the dedication and cooperation of all the governments in the world. Take global warming for an example. One person boycotting car use, or even a thousand people doing the same thing, won’t change the situation for a little bit. And after the unsuccessful climate summit in Copenhagen, we have realized how difficult it is to summon a global effort.

Secondly, it is human nature to focus on the immediate interests, which makes it hard for individuals to genuinely care about the environment. As an individual, we care the most about our own well-being and pay less attention to issues beyond our immediate interests. Like environmental protection. We don’t really worry about the gradual rising of sea level which will result in the submerging of small islands like Mal Dive. We may have lost a perfect honey moon destination, but there is still a bunch at hand. In this case, we should rely on the governments to urge and oblige their citizens to act altruistically and look into the big picture. For instance, the government may suspend factories that are emitting too much pollutant into the air or designate that cars with even and odd numbered licenses should take alternative days to go on street. When it comes to restrain our behavior for the sake of environmental protection, the government’s role is indispensible.